Scholarly sources are products of academic research and scholarship. The peer-reviewed journal article is the gold standard source type, but when you search in a library database you may also find book chapters or entire books, dissertations (what someone writes to get their doctorate degree---these are book length), conference proceedings, etc.
How do articles get peer reviewed? What role does peer review play in scholarly research and publication? This video will explain.
A common assignment requirement is that you find a peer-reviewed empirical journal article. This means that not only should it be a scholarly article, but that it needs to report on the results of a research study.
Start by reading the article abstract. Does the author talk about their data and methodology?
Look at the article itself. Most will follow a particular structure:
Meta-analysis is a particular type of research methodology. PsycInfo defines meta-analysis as: "Statistical analysis of previously published empirical data." Usually, the author will indicate clearly in the article title or abstract that they are reporting on a meta-analysis.
In PsycInfo, meta-analysis articles are tagged as such in their methodology classification. However, they may also be classified as either an empirical study or a literature review, depending on the particulars of the individual article. You can always check the methodology classification of an article on the full article information page in the PsycInfo database.
You can use the date slider in the "Refine Results" column of PsycInfo to limit the date of publication to the past 5-10 years.
However, older articles may still be relevant to your literature review. Of particular note are "classic' studies or theoretical articles. How do you know if an article is a classic? Usually, it will be highly cited (i.e., it is popular and often discussed and referenced by other scholars and researchers). Here are some clues...